QuillBot as a Digital Writing Tool: An Analysis of Writing Improvement and the Development of Beginner Writers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/morfologi.v4i1.2581Keywords:
Academic Writing, Paraphrasing, QuillBot, Summarizing, Writing IndependenceAbstract
Beginner students often face difficulties in academic writing, such as organizing ideas, choosing correct grammar, and expressing information in their own words. Because of this, many students use QuillBot as a writing support tool. This study aims to understand how QuillBot helps beginner writers become more independent in academic writing. The research used a mixed-method approach with 30 students from the English Language and Literature Department at the State University of Medan, with data collected through a Likert-scale questionnaire and open-ended reflections. The findings show that more than 70% of the students use QuillBot frequently in their writing tasks. Most students said that QuillBot helps improve grammar accuracy, sentence clarity, and paraphrasing skills, and also increases their confidence in writing. The summarizing feature also helps students identify and restate main ideas. However, 59% of the students noted that using QuillBot too much may reduce creativity and lead to dependency. The study concludes that QuillBot is helpful as a supporting tool for writing, but it should be used in balance. Students still need to practice writing independently so they can develop their own writing style and confidence.
Downloads
References
Alharbi, A. (2023). Automated writing assistance in foreign language classrooms: Pedagogical perspectives. Journal of Language Education and Research, 15(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331
Aprianoto, N., Putri, S. A., & Kurniawan, D. (2024). University students’ paraphrasing strategies across gender: A comparative study. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 45–59. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/61465
Asmara, A., & Kastuhandani, R. (2024). Student experiences with QuillBot: A phenomenological study. Asian EFL Journal, 26(3), 150–168. https://asian-efl-journal.com/
Basori, M. A. (2018). Academic writing. UIN Press. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/4459/
Budianto, L., Wijaya, D., & Setiawan, I. (2022). Summary writing as a means of enhancing comprehension and accuracy: A systematic review (2014–2021). Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 18(4), 32–50. https://www.jolleonline.org/index.php/jolle/article/view/629
Burkhard, T. (2022). Students’ perceptions of AI-powered writing technologies. Computers & Education, 185, 104524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104524
Dirgeyasa, I. W. (2017). The effective academic writing: A breakthrough of writing essay, summarizing, & paraphrasing. PUSSIS UNIMED. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/
El-Garawany, A. (2024). Improving EFL students’ writing performance using QuillBot. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-1
Kim, J. (2023). The effects of QuillBot on syntactic complexity, lexical richness, and readability in EFL writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 61, 101005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101005
Kurniati, R., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Postgraduate students’ perceptions of QuillBot in academic writing. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i2.23861
Laila, F., & Daulay, S. (2024). QuillBot as an academic writing tool: Students’ perceptions. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 6(1), 89–101. https://ejournal.iain-manado.ac.id/index.php/ijoltl/article/view/4984
Latifah, N., Hidayati, R., & Arifin, Z. (2024). QuillBot in academic writing: A systematic literature review. Journal of Language Learning Research, 12(3), 55–72. https://journal.example.com/jllr2024
Michiels, P. (2022). Paraphrasing instruction and plagiarism prevention. Journal of Academic Writing, 12(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v12i2.828
Mohammad, H., Singh, R., & Abdullah, M. (2023). QuillBot as a tool for paraphrasing in academic writing: Student perceptions. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 10(2), 22–36. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/1431
Noor Hanim Rahmat. (2025). Paraphrasing strategies in academic writing: A cognitive and linguistic analysis. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.59930/aje_ls.v13i1.689
Rustan, F. R., Kalsum, T. U., Susanti, W., Syafruddin, S., Junaedi, A. T., Indriyati, C., Hartati, R., Hendriayani, Y., Sabur, F., Alfian, H., Renaldo, N., Maryani, S., Khartha, A., & Ristiani, R. (2020). Teknik penulisan karya ilmiah. Penerbit Tri Edukasi Ilmiah. https://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/4459/
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Suppl 2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Thohir, M., Adityo, B., & Rahmawati, N. (2024). Integrating QuillBot into paraphrasing instruction: A classroom study. TESOL International Journal, 19(2), 121–137. https://tesol-international-journal.com
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Morfologi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



