Ragam Bahasa Indonesia dalam Prompt AI
Studi Komparatif Gaya Respons ChatGPT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/morfologi.v4i3.2699Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Indonesian Standard Language, Prompt Engineering, Response StyleAbstract
This study examines the influence of standard (baku) and non-standard (informal) Indonesian language in prompt construction on the response style and structure generated by ChatGPT. The proliferation of generative AI in Indonesia presents a gap: most users interact with AI using everyday informal language, while the effect on AI response characteristics remains understudied. Using a comparative qualitative approach, two prompt variants formal standard language and informal non-standard language were tested on an identical object: an internet service package (HOME ODS, 100 Mbps, Rp150,000/month). Responses were evaluated across five dimensions: structure, completeness, analytical depth, register alignment, and practical utility. Findings show that formal-language prompts yield more hierarchically organized and elaborated responses, while informal prompts elicit concise, conversational responses marked by emoji and colloquial tone. Both prompt types produced substantively comparable information, indicating that language variety primarily shapes response style rather than content depth. These findings suggest ChatGPT adapts its register to match user input, a behavior consistent with statistical pattern prediction inherent to large language models (LLMs). Implications for Indonesian language education and AI literacy are discussed.
Downloads
References
Annas, A. N., Lestari, D. P., Lestari, R., Hanim, S. A., & Malay, I. (2025). Pelatihan teknis “prompt engineering” dalam pemanfaatan AI ChatGPT untuk meningkatkan kemampuan menulis artikel ilmiah mahasiswa baru. ABDIRA: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 5(3), 245–256.
Baskoro, T., & Nuddin, S. R. (2024). Analisa kinerja ChatGPT dalam menghasilkan teks bahasa Indonesia menggunakan metode Support Vector Machines (SVM). JINACS: Journal of Informatics and Computer Science, 6(3).
Dermawan, R. D., & Herdianto. (2024). Meningkatkan kinerja output ChatGPT melalui teknik prompt engineering yang dapat dikustomisasi. INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(1), 10646–10664.
Fatawi, I., Asy’ari, M., Hunaepi, H., Samsuri, T., & Bilad, M. R. (2024). Empowering language models through advanced prompt engineering: A comprehensive bibliometric review. Indonesian Journal of Science & Technology, 9(2), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v9i2
Financy, F., & Irwansyah. (2025). Proses komunikasi mahasiswa dengan ChatGPT: Perspektif teori komunikasi manusia-mesin. Jurnal IPTEK-KOM, 27(1), 35–56.
Haromain, I., Munir, S., & Rahmah, A. (2025). Analisa prompt engineering pada Large Language Model dengan Retrieval-Augmented Generation untuk informasi obat dan vitamin. Indonesian Journal Computer Science, 4(2), 144–153.
Liu, Y., Deng, G., Xu, Z., Li, Y., Zheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhao, L., Wang, C., Zhang, T., & Liu, Y. (2024). Jailbreaking ChatGPT via prompt engineering: An empirical study. arXiv. arXiv:2305.13860v2 [cs.SE].
Lubis, A. H., Triarisanti, R., Ansas, V. N., Widyana, A., & Susanti, A. (2026). Penguatan kompetensi prompting dalam penggunaan ChatGPT untuk menulis akademik bagi mahasiswa FKIP Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta. Jurnal Abdimas Indonesia, 6(2).
Mulyanto, A., & Istoningtyas, M. (2024). Analisis kepuasan pengguna aplikasi ChatGPT menggunakan metode E-SERVQUAL. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi (JMS), 4(2). https://doi.org/10.33998/jms.v4i2
Muqaddimah, S., Shakilla, A. F., & Kesuma, D. P. (2025). Pengaruh gaya bahasa dan pilihan kata terhadap output ChatGPT: Systematic literature review. Jurnal Nasional Komputasi dan Teknologi Informasi (JNKTI), 8(3).
OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774
Pangestu, D., & Kovit, Z. (2025). Hubungan antara ketepatan berbahasa dan akurasi respons AI: Studi pada prompt bahasa Indonesia. Karimah Tauhid, 4(8), 5949–5954.
Priastuty, C. W., Sugandi, M. S., & Srikandi, M. B. (2025). Prompt engineering dan etika komunikasi dalam era kecerdasan buatan: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial, 9(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.38043/jids.v9i2.6882
Reistanti, A. P. (2026). Analisis kesalahan berbahasa pada prompt ChatGPT dalam bahasa Indonesia: Kajian sintaksis. Bahterasia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(1).
Rizky, M. A. (2025). Analisis efektivitas dua jenis gaya prompt dalam model LLM berbasis RAG. Jurnal Komtika, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.31603/komtika.v9i1.13488
Suhaeni, C., Kamila, S. A., Fahira, F., Yusran, M., & Dito, G. A. (2025). Exploring a Large Language Model on the ChatGPT platform for Indonesian text preprocessing tasks. Indonesian Journal of Statistics and Its Applications (IJSA), 9(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.29244/ijsa.v9i1p100-116
Utomo, N. C., & Destrianto, M. R. (2025). Rekayasa prompt untuk pustakawan menggunakan ChatGPT-4o. Media Pustakawan, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.37014/medpus.v31i3.5256
Vemprala, S., Bonatti, R., Bucker, A., & Kapoor, A. (2023). ChatGPT for robotics: Design principles and model abilities. arXiv. arXiv:2306.17582v2 [cs.AI].
White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., Elnashar, A., Spencer-Smith, J., & Schmidt, D. C. (2023). A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with ChatGPT. arXiv. arXiv:2302.11382v1 [cs.SE].
Woo, D. J., Guo, K., & Susanto, H. (2023). Cases of EFL secondary students’ prompt engineering pathways to complete a writing task with ChatGPT. arXiv. arXiv:2307.05493v1.
Yamada, M. (2023). Optimizing machine translation through prompt engineering: An investigation into ChatGPT’s customizability. In Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit XIX (Vol. 2, pp. 195–204).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Morfologi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
