The Structure of Classroom Talk: Applying the Sinclair & Coulthard Model in Teaching Descriptive Text

Authors

  • Ami Girsang Universitas Negeri Medan
  • M. Rafif Zaki Ramadhan Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Rina Trie Syahputri Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Sandra Sridevi Hutapea Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Zuraima Fitriani Salim Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v3i6.2316

Keywords:

Classroom Talk, Discourse Analysis, EFL Teaching, IRF Model, Teacher-Student Interaction

Abstract

This study aims to explore the use of classroom talk in Indonesian EFL classrooms, specifically when teaching descriptive texts. Utilizing Sinclair & Coulthard's (1975) discourse analysis theory, the study focuses on the Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) model, which offers a framework for analyzing classroom interactions. By applying this model, classroom discourse can be broken down into a hierarchical structure that includes Exchanges, Moves, and Acts. This structure allows for a detailed examination of teacher-student communication, making its subtle nuances more explicit and accessible for analysis. The IRF model is widely recognized for its applicability and effectiveness in identifying the functional roles of utterances in classroom talk. One key observation from this study is that teacher-led initiation and questioning often dominate the discourse, with students primarily responding to the teacher’s prompts. The study suggests that the implications of the IRF model can help teachers reflect on their communication patterns and improve their teaching methods. By transforming teacher-centered scaffolding into a more student-centered approach, teachers can foster more effective interactions that enhance student engagement and learning. The study also highlights the importance of using the IRF model as a diagnostic tool for improving classroom communication practices and encouraging more dynamic and student-oriented teaching methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140

Al-Smadi, O. A. (2017). A theoretical review of classroom discourse. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v6-i3/3169

Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1), 1–14. http://sites.psu.edu/fa2014vicarocas201/wp-content/uploads/sites/15238/2014/08/40236733.pdf

Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Heinemann. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED461844

Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2016). Teaching language in context. Oxford University Press.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1995). Making sense of functional grammar: An introductory workbook.

Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom: Students, teachers and researchers. A&C Black.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269

Handayani, G. M., & Cahyono, A. F. (2024). Classroom interaction: Teacher talk and students' responses. ICON: Islamic Communication and Contemporary Media Studies, 3(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.35719/icon.v3i1.34

Hasanah, N. U., Sari, N. N. A., & Husein, N. R. (2024). Initiation–response–feedback (IRF) pattern of Sinclair and Coulthard model in English classroom interaction. Deleted Journal, 2(5), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v2i5.1102

Hashmi, S. G. (2025). Sinclair and Coulthard model: Understanding linguistic choices and patterns in classroom teaching. International Journal of Teaching Learning and Education, 4(3), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijtle.4.3.14

Hou, R., Bühler, B., Fütterer, T., Bozkir, E., Gerjets, P., Trautwein, U., & Kasneci, E. (2025). Multimodal assessment of classroom discourse quality: A text-centered attention-based multi-task learning approach. Computers and Society. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07902

Hsu, P., & Roth, W. (2008). An analysis of teacher discourse that introduces real science activities to high school students. Research in Science Education, 39(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9094-9

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Praeger.

Liu, H., Ismail, L., & Ahmad, N. K. (2023). Genre-based approaches and ESL/EFL writing: A review of the literature. World Journal of English Language, 14(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n2p25

Luk, J. C. M. (2015). Classroom discourse and the construction of learner and teacher identities. In Springer eBooks (pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02322-9_11-1

Maghfur, N. B. (2021). Classroom discourse analysis of teacher–students interaction. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 4(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v4i1.9272

Martin, J. R. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause.

Mercer, N. (2002). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464984

Natalia, C. H., & Batubara, K. B. (2020). The differences between English and Indonesian lecturer in the classroom interaction based on Sinclair and Coulthard model. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 1(3), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v1i3.143

Nicholson, S. J. (2014). An impetus for change: Classroom analysis using Sinclair and Coulthard’s model of spoken discourse. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(2), 188. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v6i2.5464

Rees, C. A. B., & Roth, W. (2019). Discourse forms in a classroom transitioning to student-centred scientific inquiry through co-teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 41(5), 586–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1571649

Riwayatiningsih, R. (2024). Teachers' language use in EFL classroom interaction: A qualitative study analysis in Indonesia settings. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(6), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i61400

Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox Publishing.

Sebayang, H. J., Husein, R., & Harahap, N. A. S. (2024). A classroom discourse analysis of teacher–students’ interaction at SMP Negeri 7 Medan. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 7(4), 14538–14542.

Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.

Sulaiman, Y. S. (2021). Pembelajaran bahasa Inggris di Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 1 Kupang Nusa Tenggara Timur: Sebuah kajian dalam perspektif etnografi. Jurnal Ekonomi, Sosial & Humaniora, 2(8), 61–65. https://www.jurnalintelektiva.com/index.php/jurnal/article/view/435

Suwandy, I., Ginting, S. A., & Suswati, R. (2018). Classroom interaction with different subject based on Sinclair and Coulthard model. Register Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.24114/reg.v7i3.12065

Usman, K., & Mujahidah, N. (2021). Classroom discourse analysis on language interaction at the first level class of Star English Course Parepare. Inspiring English Education Journal, 4(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v4i2.1953

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wasi’ah, N. (2016). A study of teacher talk in classroom interaction at an Islamic senior high school. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v10i1.809

Weil, M., Seidel, T., Schindler, A., & Gröschner, A. (2020). Opening “windows” for teachers to change classroom discourse. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 26, 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100425

Wells, C. G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605895

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23

How to Cite

Ami Girsang, M. Rafif Zaki Ramadhan, Rina Trie Syahputri, Sandra Sridevi Hutapea, & Zuraima Fitriani Salim. (2025). The Structure of Classroom Talk: Applying the Sinclair & Coulthard Model in Teaching Descriptive Text. Sintaksis : Publikasi Para Ahli Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 3(6), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v3i6.2316

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.