Ujaran Kebencian dalam Film Crash: Analisis Bentuk dan Fungsi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v4i3.2691Keywords:
Hate Speech, Impoliteness, Pragmatics, Speech Act, StereotypeAbstract
The study examines hate speech in the film Crash as a representation of social interaction influenced by stereotypes, prejudice, and power relations among characters. The objective of this research is to identify and analyze the form and pragmatic function of hate speech as manifested in the film’s dialogues. A descriptive qualitative method was employed, with data collected through observation and note-taking techniques. The data consist of selected utterances from character interactions containing elements of hate speech, which were analyzed using a pragmatic approach supported by speech act theory and impoliteness theory. The findings reveal that hate speech is predominantly realized through positive impoliteness strategies, particularly in the form of stereotyping and negative generalizations toward specific social groups. Furthermore, hate speech functions as assertive illocutionary acts through which speakers express and reinforce stereotypical beliefs as if they were socially accepted truths. These results indicate that linguistic expressions in the film not only convey literal meanings but also construct and reflect broader social ideologies and conflicts within a multicultural society.
Downloads
References
Anwar, A., Santoso, A., & Alifian, M. A. (2024). Hortatori. 8, 312–321.
Barbas, S. (2025). How American Civil Rights Groups Defeated Hate Speech Laws. SSRN Electronic Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5344563
Culpeper, J., & Hardaker, C. (2017). Impoliteness. The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_9
Cutting, J. (2020). pragmatics and discourse. https://uogbooks.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/stylistics-a-resource-book-for-students-paul-simpson.pdf %0A
Hassan, A. F., & Muhammed, W. S. M. (2022). A Critical Pragmatic Study of Hate Speech in Some Selected American Movies. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(6), 5338–5354. http://journalppw.com
Huang, Y. (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Ismail, I. (n.d.). Pendekatan kualitatif.
Kádár. (2017). Im)politeness in intercultural encounters-2017 Side 1/6 Khaled Oraby. 4(1), 1–6.
Levinson, S. C. (2024). The Dark Matter of Pragmatics. In The Dark Matter of Pragmatics (Vol. 6464). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009489584
Mashun. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. In Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. http://eprints.unram.ac.id/29724/1/KUM C2. Buku Metode Peneltian Bahasa.pdf
Mondal, M., Silva, L. A., & Benevenuto, F. (2017a). A measurement study of hate speech in social media. HT 2017 - Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078714.3078723
Prof.DR.Alo Liliweri, M. . (2021). Komunikasi Antar Budaya: Antara Nilai Motivasi dan Orientasi Nilai Budaya. Nusamedia, 2021.
Rahardi. (2020). Linguistik Indonesia.
Sukmawan, R. (2018). Kajian Penolakan dalam Lingkup Linguistik. UMMIPress.
Sukmawan, R., & Supendi, D. A. (2016). Structural Presupposition in Wayang Golek. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(7), 123–131.
Wylot, D. (2020). Everywhere and all the time: accident, radical contingency, and Crash. Textual Practice, 34(8), 1345–1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2019.1580213
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sintaksis : Publikasi Para ahli Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



