Pragmatic Study of Discourse Markers in Scientific and Non Scientific Academic Articles

Authors

  • Mawj khalil Ibrahim Department of Psychological Counseling and Educational Guidance, College of Education, Al mustansiriyah University, Baghdad , Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/morfologi.v2i5.938

Keywords:

Discourse Markers, Academic Writing, Scientific Articles, Non-Scientific Articles, Pragmatic Application, Writing Pedagogy, Linguistic Analysis

Abstract

In the tricky landscape of instructional writing, discourse markers serve as pivotal linguistic equipment, guiding readers via complicated arguments and making sure logical drift. This research embarked on a complete exploration of discourse markers throughout clinical and non-medical genres. Through a comparative analysis, awesome styles in the frequency and distribution of these markers emerged, reflecting the specific epistemological and methodological underpinnings of every genre. The have a look at similarly delved into the practical roles of those markers, highlighting their contribution to coherence, argumentative shape, and universal readability. The examination of interdisciplinary articles discovered a completely unique linguistic identification, emphasizing the complexity of melding conventions from more than one disciplines. The findings no longer most effective shed light on the pragmatic software of discourse markers however also underscore their significance in educational writing pedagogy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alarcon, J. V., & Morales, L. F. (2011). Metadiscourse in essay writing: A cross-linguistic comparison. Revista Signos, 44(74), 3-14.

Bayley, P., & Lucas, C. (2018). Sociolinguistic variation in the X-phemism of English euphemism and dysphemism. Language Variation and Change, 30(3), 309-331.

Bhatnagar, V., Duari, S., & Gupta, S. K. (2022). Quantitative discourse cohesion analysis of scientific scholarly texts using multilayer networks (Preprint). arXiv:2205.07532.

Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.

Dong, Y., Mircea, A., & Cheung, J. C. K. (2020). Discourse-aware unsupervised summarization of long scientific documents (Preprint). arXiv:2005.00513.

Fox Tree, J. E. (2010). Discourse markers across speakers and settings. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(5), 269-281.

Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931-952.

Heeman, P. A., & Allen, J. F. (1997). Intonational boundaries, speech repairs, and discourse markers: Modeling spoken dialog (Preprint). arXiv:9704008.

Henning, S., Macher, N., Grünewald, S., & Friedrich, A. (2022). MIST: A large-scale annotated resource and neural models for functions of modal verbs in English scientific text (Preprint). arXiv:2212.07156.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.

Kuo, C. H. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121-138.

Li, X., Burns, G., & Peng, N. (2019). Scientific discourse tagging for evidence extraction (Preprint). arXiv:1909.04758.

Lopes, A., Martins de Matos, D., Cabarrão, V., Ribeiro, R., Moniz, H., Trancoso, I., & Mata, A. I. (2015). Towards using machine translation techniques to induce multilingual lexica of discourse markers (Preprint). arXiv:1503.09144.

Lyons, J. (2014). Semantics: Volume 1. Cambridge University Press.

Redeker, G. (1991). Review article: Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 29(6), 1139-1172.

Saksik, R., Molina-Villegas, A., Linhares, A. C., & Torres-Moreno, J. M. (2020). Automatic discourse segmentation: An evaluation in French (Preprint). arXiv:2002.04095.

Sileo, D., Van de Cruys, T., Pradel, C., & Muller, P. (2020). DiscSense: Automated semantic analysis of discourse markers (Preprint). arXiv:2006.01603.

Simons, M., & Levinson, S. C. (2011). The logic of conversation as an argument for the semantics and pragmatics of q-markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 11-33.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). News as discourse. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-29

How to Cite

Mawj khalil Ibrahim. (2024). Pragmatic Study of Discourse Markers in Scientific and Non Scientific Academic Articles. Morfologi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra Dan Budaya, 2(5), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.61132/morfologi.v2i5.938

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.