Applying Peer Feedback To Enhance High School EFL Students' Writing Skills In State High School 1 Rejotangan Tulungagung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/morfologi.v2i5.951Keywords:
Peer Feedback, Writing Ability, EFLAbstract
Writing is the most challenging skill in English language learning. Researchers at SMKN 1 Rejotangan observed that most students struggled with writing in English. To address this, they implemented the peer feedback method to enhance students' writing skills. The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of peer feedback in improving students’ writing abilities. Using a convergent mixed-method design, the research involved 31 students from class XI AKC 2. Instruments included pre-tests, post-tests for quantitative data, and interviews for qualitative data. Quantitative analysis was conducted using a t-test with SPSS 27, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results showed significant improvement in students' writing skills after using peer feedback, as indicated by a significance value of 0.00 < 0.05. Interviews with five selected participants also revealed positive responses. Hence, the peer feedback method positively impacted the writing abilities of class XI AKC 2 students at SMKN 1 Rejotangan.
Downloads
References
Almutairi, R. T. (2023). EFL students’ reactions to peer versus teacher feedback to improve writing skills: A study at intermediate school level. English Language Teaching, 16(4), 1–88.
Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (Vol. 10). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Cohen, A. D. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers.
Creswell, J. W. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
Daar, G. (2020). Problems of English language learning in context. PKBM SAMBI POLENG.
Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Routledge.
Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2001). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Wiley Online Library.
Gonzalez-Torres, P., & Sarango, C. (2023). Effectiveness of teacher and peer feedback in EFL writing: A case of high school students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(4), 73–86.
Haines, C. (2021). Assessing students’ written work: Marking essays and reports. Routledge.
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. London/New York, 401–405.
He, W., & Gao, Y. (2023). Explicating peer feedback quality and its impact on feedback implementation in EFL writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1177094.
Hermawan, A. H., Hidayat, W., & Fajari, I. (2020). Manajemen perpustakaan dalam meningkatkan minat baca peserta didik. Jurnal Isema: Islamic Educational Management, 5(1), 113–126.
Hornby, A. S. (2006). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary. New York: Oxford University.
Hughey, J. B. (1983). Teaching ESL composition: Principles and techniques. Newbury House Publishers, A Division of Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212.
Hyland, K. (2010). Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies.
Iryanti, D. (2015). The effectiveness of peer feedback in improving students’ writing achievement (An experimental study at SMA Negeri 11 Kota Tangerang Selatan). Jakarta: FITK UIN Jakarta.
Kurniawati, E. W. (2020). Evaluasi program pendidikan perspektif model CIPP (context, input, process, product). GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal, 1(1), 19–25.
Lee, N. S. (2009). Written peer feedback by EFL students: Praise, criticism and suggestion. Komaba Journal of English Education, 1, 129–139.
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302.
Marufiana, A. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward the use of online peer feedback in ‘Writing for the Media’ class. Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FBS-UKSW.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Montolalu, C., & Langi, Y. (2018). Pengaruh pelatihan dasar komputer dan teknologi informasi bagi guru-guru dengan uji-t berpasangan (paired sample t-test). D’CARTESIAN: Jurnal Matematika Dan Aplikasi, 7(1), 44–46.
Mubarok, A. F. (2012). Penyesuaian diri para pendatang di lingkungan baru. Journal of Social and Industrial Psychology, 1(1).
Najogi, J., & Adnan, A. (2019). Using peer correction towards students writing ability in writing analytical exposition text at senior high school. Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 127–138.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press.
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic English. Pearson.
Penny, U. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge University.
Permata Sari Pranoto, M. (2013). English story-telling to help early childhood students’ physical, linguistic, and social-emotional growths. Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FBS-UKSW.
Peterson, S. S. (2010). Feedback as a teaching tool for improving student writing. [Monograph] What Works. Research into Practice.
Prompan, J., & Piamsai, C. (2024). The effects of peer feedback and self-regulated learning on Thai EFL students’ writing ability and self-regulation. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 100–132.
Putra, I. G. K. M., Santosa, M. H., & Pratiwi, N. P. A. (2021). Students’ perceptions on online peer feedback practice in EFL writing. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education, 8(2), 213–231.
Rohmah, Z. A. N. (2024). Procedure text using realia (A classroom action research on grade XI students of SMA Nuris Jember in academic year of 2023-2024). UIN KH Ahmad Siddiq Jember.
Sharmin, S. (2019). Peer feedback as a strategy to teach writing to first year students. ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies, 8(12), 10–19.
Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Menulis sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa (Edisi Revisi). Angkasa.
Tridinanti, G., Roni, R., & Sari, F. (2020). Using peer editing and peer feedback techniques in writing to private university students. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 10(3), 383–395.
Velez, P. E. A., & dos Santos, J. C. (2023). The impact of peer feedback on students’ oral production. YUYAY: Estrategias, Metodologías & Didácticas Educativas, 2(1), 53–67.
Widyastuti, A., Suryaman, M., & Puspitaloka, N. (2021). Implementing peer feedback in learning recount text writing skill: Students' engagement and perception. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education, 4(6), 922–929.
Wijaya, K. F. (2022). The positive effects of problem-based learning activities toward Indonesian EFL learners’ productive language skills. JET (Journal of English Teaching, 8(2), 182–194.
Wilbers, S., & Sullivan, F. (2016). Keys to great writing revised and expanded: Mastering the elements of composition and revision. Penguin.
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 492–526.
Yuniarti, Y., Walajro, J., & Mukhlis, H. (2023). Teknik peer editing dan peer feedback dalam menulis narasi teks pada mahasiswa Universitas PGRI Palembang. Nusantara Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2(2), 35–40.
Zahira, Z., Maneba, S., & Nety, N. (2021). The study of students’ writing ability on grade eleven of SMK Negeri 1 Kambowa. English Education Journal, 56–63.
Zhang, F., Schunn, C., Chen, S., Li, W., & Li, R. (2023). EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101255.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Morfologi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.