Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition a Dynamic and Developmental Perspective

Authors

  • Chyntia Farah Agustine Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sidoarjo
  • Azmil Hanafia Risqi Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sidoarjo
  • Ikhwan Edi Nasution Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sidoarjo
  • Nur Aisyah Fitri Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sidoarjo
  • Masyitah Noviyanti Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sidoarjo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v4i1.2575

Keywords:

Cognitive development, Dynamic systems, Individual differences, Second language acquisition, Working memory

Abstract

Working memory (WM) has been extensively studied as a cognitive factor influencing second language acquisition (SLA), but many studies treat it as a static, trait-like capacity. This approach provides limited insight into how WM works across different stages of development, proficiency levels, and learning contexts. This article combines theoretical and empirical research on working memory in SLA from a dynamic and developmental perspective, analyzing how the influence of WM varies over time and interacts with other cognitive and contextual factors. Referencing Baddeley's multicomponent model, complex dynamic systems theory, and longitudinal research, this article examines evidence regarding the role of WM in various language domains, including vocabulary learning, grammar processing, and language production. It also investigates how WM works differently at various proficiency levels and developmental periods, from childhood to adulthood. Evidence suggests that WM plays a very strong role in the early stages of learning when processing is effortful and controlled, but becomes less central as linguistic knowledge becomes automated. The relationship between WM and SLA appears to be bidirectional, with sustained language learning contributing to the development of specific WM components, particularly executive control. The influence of WM varies significantly based on task characteristics, teaching context, and learner profiles. Understanding WM as a dynamic resource rather than a fixed constraint has important pedagogical implications. Instructions that manage cognitive load, provide support, and encourage metacognitive awareness can help learners with diverse cognitive profiles. A developmental approach in WM research requires longitudinal designs and task-aligned methodologies to capture changes over time, thereby advancing theory and practice in SLA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422

Chai, C. S. (2022). Working memory and second language learning: A meta-analytic review. Second Language Research, 38(4), 567–594.

Coumel, M., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Segaert, K. (2023). Working memory and structural priming in second language sentence production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 44(1), 1–25.

Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Morgan-Short, K. (2018). The interplay of individual differences and context of learning in second language development. Second Language Research, 34(1), 67–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316684903

Huang, B., Wen, Z., & Wang, Z. (2020). Working memory and foreign language learning: A dynamic systems perspective. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 55, Article 100908.

Jackson, D. O. (2020). The dynamic nature of working memory in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 70(Suppl. 1), 135–170.

Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000509

Kormos, J. (2023). The role of working memory in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 59, Article 100945.

Lim, H., & Lee, S. (2025). Working memory and incidental vocabulary learning through reading in a second language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 37(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/67481

Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2

Meng, X. (2023). Cognitive load and working memory in second language instruction. System, 113, Article 102992.

Rasheed, S., Wen, Z., & Wang, Z. (2025). Cognitive and affective predictors of second language proficiency in multilingual contexts. Applied Linguistics, 46(1), 1–27.

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

Teng, F. (2025). Working memory, metacognitive knowledge, and vocabulary development in young bilingual learners. Language Learning, 75(1), 45–78.

Verhagen, J., & Leseman, P. (2016). How do verbal short-term memory and working memory relate to vocabulary and grammar development? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 144, 80–99.

Wang, Z. (2024). Working memory capacity and vocabulary learning in adult second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(1), 1–26.

Wen, Z. (2012). Working memory as language aptitude: The phonological/executive model. Language Learning, 62(Suppl. 2), 112–142.

Wen, Z., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2015). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000276

Zhao, Y. (2022). Working memory and second language reading comprehension: A cognitive load perspective. Reading and Writing, 35, 1251–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10192-z

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Chyntia Farah Agustine, Azmil Hanafia Risqi, Ikhwan Edi Nasution, Nur Aisyah Fitri, & Masyitah Noviyanti. (2026). Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition a Dynamic and Developmental Perspective. Sintaksis : Publikasi Para Ahli Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 4(1), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v4i1.2575

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.