Linguistic Structure and Hypnolinguistic Mechanisms of Neuro-Linguistic Programming Discourse in Shaping Students' Speech and Design Thinking in Senior High Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v4i4.2851Keywords:
Classroom Discourse, Design Thinking, Educational Linguistics, Hypnolinguistics, Neuro-Linguistic ProgrammingAbstract
Language functions not only as a medium of communication but also as a cognitive mechanism shaping thought, behavior, and problem-solving abilities. In Indonesian secondary schools, students are often exposed to negative linguistic environments characterized by verbal bullying, authoritarian classroom discourse, and discouraging communication, potentially affecting their self-concept and creative thinking. This study investigates the linguistic structures and hypnolinguistic mechanisms of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) discourse in shaping students' speech and Design Thinking skills. A qualitative interdisciplinary case study with embedded pre- and post-intervention comparisons was conducted over 16 weeks at SMA Islam Plus Adzkia, West Java. Participants included 30 students purposively selected based on high exposure to verbal trauma and eight educators. Data were collected through classroom observations, audio-recorded interactions, discourse transcriptions, self-talk protocols, Design Thinking project assessments, and observations of neurolinguistic communication markers. Data analysis integrated Critical Discourse Analysis, Transformational-Generative Syntax, cognitive semantics, and speech act theory. Findings indicate that NLP-based discourse intervention transformed classroom communication by reducing directive and authoritarian expressions while increasing presuppositional, sensory-based, and supportive linguistic patterns. Students demonstrated reduced self-deprecating language and increased expressions of agency, confidence, and figurative language use. Improvements were also observed in speech fluency, communication confidence, and linguistic competence. Design Thinking performance improved across all dimensions, particularly during ideation, suggesting that constructive linguistic environments facilitate creative problem-solving and innovation. Correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship between linguistic transformation and Design Thinking performance, indicating that supportive discourse promotes cognitive and communicative development. These findings underscore the value of integrating NLP-informed communication strategies into classroom practice to strengthen students' linguistic confidence, higher-order thinking skills, and innovative pedagogy.
Downloads
References
Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975). The structure of magic I: A book about language and therapy. Science and Behavior Books.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ingram, J. C. (2007). Neurolinguistics: An introduction to spoken language processing and its disorders. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618963
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of neural science (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Kristiantari, M. G. R., Purnami, I. G. A. L., Tristiantari, N. K. D., Bayu, G. W., Dewantara, K. A. K., & Dewi, N. P. U. (2025). Design Thinking learning with a Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) approach to enhance autonomous learning in early writing and reading. International Journal of Language Education, 9(3), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.77406
Kurniawan, E., Muniroh, R. D. D., Sudana, D., Gunawan, W., Dallyono, R., & Zifana, M. (2025). Gerakan bijak berbahasa: Strategi peningkatan kesadaran berbahasa untuk mencegah perundungan dan kekerasan verbal di lingkungan sekolah. Abdi: Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 7(4), 1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.24036/abdi.v7i4.1398
Maalikih, M. D., Sumarwati, & Rakhmawati, A. (2024). Degrading sarcasm in verbal bullying: A speech act study on junior high school students in Surakarta, Indonesia. Proceeding of the International Conference of Innovation, Science, Technology, Education, Children, and Health, 1(1).
Muyasiroh, W., Mubin, K., Muyasaroh, W., Ashfia, A., & Zulfa, A. W. (2025). Exploring transformational generative grammar in Arabic textbooks for junior high school: A qualitative library research. An-Nabighoh, 27(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.32332/an-nabighoh.v27i2.245-264
Steinberg, D. D., & Sciarini, N. V. (2006). An introduction to psycholinguistics. Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.
Yualita, P., Sajodin, Maelany, R., & Kaban, F. H. (2025). Language politeness training for verbal bullying prevention: A pre-post intervention study at Muhammadiyah 3 Plus High School, Bandung. Abdimas, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.35568/abdimas.v8i4.7147
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Masniati Murni Ritonga

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




