The Student Intersction In Learning English

Authors

  • Nazry Nasyifa Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Aisyah Hafizha Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Fadiah Nur Amalia Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Zahira Shofa Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Nadiya Fitria Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Didik Santoso Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v2i3.894

Keywords:

Student interaction, English language learning, Game-based learning, Interactive learning

Abstract

Through the use of instructional games, this study investigates the function of student engagement in the acquisition of the English language. This study uses a combination of in-depth interviews, thematic analysis, and direct observation along with qualitative research methodologies to investigate the dynamics of student interaction in a game-based learning environment. The findings demonstrated that the usage of games greatly enhanced language proficiency, student engagement, and communication abilities. During the game sessions, there was a 40% rise in the use of new vocabulary and a 60% increase in English verbal contact. Furthermore, 80% of groups demonstrated greater levels of cooperation, and 75% of students actively participated in class. The use of mother tongue has decreased by 30% as well. This study shows that game-based learning has significant potential to enhance students' linguistic competency and collaborative skills in learning English, despite obstacles like uneven participation and other distractions. The significance of choosing games that are suitable, providing scaffolding, managing the classroom well, and incorporating formative assessment strategies are all practical implications for educators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arofah, S., & Mubarok, H. (2021). An analysis of violation and flouting maxim on teacher-students interaction in English teaching and learning process. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 15(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v15i2.28148

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36-56.

Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13-24. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved July 5, 2024, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/102615/

Lamb, M., & Arisandy, F. E. (2020). The impact of online use of English on motivation to learn. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 85-108.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.

Lauder, A. (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: A review of key factors. Makara, Sosial Humaniora, 12(1), 9-20.

Marcellino, M. (2008). English language teaching in Indonesia: A continuous challenge in education and cultural diversity. TEFLIN Journal, 19(1), 57-69.

Maulina, M., Sri Andriyani, A., Amin, S., Nasrullah, R., Asdar, A., & Hamsiah, A. (2022). Students’ perception in learning English through blended learning. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 3(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v3i1.138

Musthafa, B. (2001). Communicative language teaching in Indonesia: Issues of theoretical assumptions and challenges in classroom practice. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 2(2), 296-308.

Mustoip, S., Al Ghozali, M. I., Ziyad, M., Fadhlullah, F., Abdulrahman, S., & Assenhaji, Y. (2024). Influence of introverted and extroverted personalities on English learning interaction for elementary school students. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 6(1), 33–45.

Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412-446.

Pavlenko, A., & Norton, B. (2007). Imagined communities, identity, and English language learning. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 669-680). Springer.

Raharja, B. J. (2020). Discourse analysis on teacher-students interaction pattern of English teaching learning process in vocational high school. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 3(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v3i1.2900

Song, W., Zhang, C., & Gao, M. (2022). Analysis method for teacher-student interaction in online English courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(9), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i09.31371

Thorne, S. L. (2008). Computer-mediated communication. In N. Hornberger & N. Van Deusen-Scholl (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd Edition, Volume 4: Second and foreign language education (pp. 325-336). Springer.

Published

2024-07-12

How to Cite

Nazry Nasyifa, Aisyah Hafizha, Fadiah Nur Amalia, Zahira Shofa, Nadiya Fitria, & Didik Santoso. (2024). The Student Intersction In Learning English. Fonologi : Jurnal Ilmuan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 2(3), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v2i3.894

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)