Elevating Maritime Competence: A Qualitative Analysis of Semester 3 Cadets' Perspectives at Maritime Institute Jakarta (STIP Jakarta)

Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak

doi:10.61132/morfologi.v1i6.255

Authors

Marudut Bernadtua Simanjuntak Maritime Institute of Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/morfologi.v1i6.255

Keywords:

Cadet Perspectives, Curriculum Enhancement, English Proficiency, Maritime Education, Qualitative Analysis

Abstract

This research delves into the intricate realm of maritime education, focusing on the academic and professional preparedness of Semester 3 cadets at the Maritime Institute Jakarta (STIP Jakarta). Anchored in a qualitative descriptive approach, the study synthesizes document analysis and cadet surveys to unravel the multifaceted dynamics shaping the educational landscape. The document analysis reveals a curriculum at STIP Jakarta that aligns commendably with international standards, supported by comprehensive lecturer training programmes. However, the nuanced cadet perspectives spotlight a need for refined emphasis on the practical application of English proficiency in real-world maritime scenarios. Cadet self-assessment underscores both confidence in academic intelligence and an identified need for additional language support, calling for targeted interventions. Exploring professional competences uncovers a disparity between technical proficiency and English Maritime communication, highlighting the importance of a holistic approach to bridge this gap. Cadet motivations vary from a genuine passion for maritime activities to the allure of lucrative career prospects and international recognition. Recognizing this diversity urges the need for personalised career guidance and mentorship programmes. The research also sheds light on English Maritime and Literacy proficiency, differentiating between basic skills and the ability to handle complex communication scenarios. Recommendations include integrating advanced language modules and tailored language support initiatives within the curriculum, ensuring a seamless development of linguistic skills alongside technical competences. In conclusion, this research offers a comprehensive understanding of maritime education at STIP Jakarta, unveiling challenges and opportunities that resonate globally. The synthesis of findings and recommendations forms a compass for refining pedagogical approaches, fostering linguistic and technical adeptness in future maritime professionals. This voyage towards enhancement is not merely a localized pursuit but a contribution to the broader discourse on cultivating global competence in maritime education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albayrak, T., & Ziarati, R. (2012). Encouraging research in maritime education & training. Journal of Maritime Transport and Engineering, 1(1), 4–9.

Balkin, R. (2006). The international maritime organization and maritime security. Tul. Mar. LJ, 30, 1.

Chelliah, S. (2018). The design and implementation of documentation projects for spoken languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages (p. 147). Oxford University Press.

Christodoulou-Varotsi, I., & Pentsov, D. A. (2008). The STCW Convention and related instruments. Maritime Work Law Fundamentals: Responsible Shipowners, Reliable Seafarers, 422–639.

Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2017). Sustainable development and corporate strategies of the maritime industry. In Ports, Cities, and Global Supply Chains (pp. 249–262). Routledge.

de la Peña Zarzuelo, I., Soeane, M. J. F., & Bermúdez, B. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, 100173.

Edirisinghe, P., Zhihong, J., & Lixin, S. (2016). The Direction of Maritime Education and Training development: A Conceptual Approach. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Maritime Education and Training, Dalian Maritime University, 15th October.

Ferritto, V. R. (2016). Maritime education factors and presenteeism: a comparative quantitative study. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15, 353–380.

Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42.

Manuel, M. E. (2017). Vocational and academic approaches to maritime education and training (MET): Trends, challenges and opportunities. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 473–483.

McColm, D. G. F. (2019). A cross-linguistic investigation of the way-construction in English, Dutch, and German. University of Edinburgh.

Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Munim, Z. H., Dushenko, M., Jimenez, V. J., Shakil, M. H., & Imset, M. (2020). Big data and artificial intelligence in the maritime industry: a bibliometric review and future research directions. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(5), 577–597.

Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2013). Still waiting, still moving: On labour, logistics and maritime industries. In Stillness in a mobile world (pp. 51–68). Routledge.

Plaza-Hernández, M., Gil-González, A. B., Rodríguez-González, S., Prieto-Tejedor, J., & Corchado-Rodríguez, J. M. (2021). Integration of IoT technologies in the maritime industry. Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Special Sessions, 17th International Conference, 107–115.

Saldana, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. SAGE publications.

Sherman, M. I., Popova, H., & Yurzhenko, A. (2018). Interactive course “Maritime English” in the professional training of future mariners.

Vivanet, G. (n.d.). The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. CONSULTING EDITORS, 183.

Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325.