Students' Perceptions of Stress, Intonation, and Rhythm in English Communication

Authors

  • Sifa Askya Universitas Labuhanbatu
  • Aslimah Nur Universitas Labuhanbatu
  • Cindy Arianti Damanik Universitas Labuhanbatu
  • Yani Lubis Universitas Labuhanbatu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v4i4.2764

Keywords:

Learner Perception, Pronunciation Teaching, Rhythm, Stress, Suprasegmental Features

Abstract

Suprasegmental elements such as stress, intonation, and rhythm play a fundamental role in spoken English communication, yet they remain consistently underrepresented in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching and curriculum design. This conceptual paper synthesizes current empirical research to examine how EFL learners perceive these three prosodic features and to explore the pedagogical implications of such perceptions for pronunciation instruction. Drawing on studies in applied linguistics, second language acquisition (SLA), and pronunciation pedagogy, this paper reveals that learners generally acknowledge the communicative significance of stress and intonation, while rhythm remains the least understood and most pedagogically neglected feature across different proficiency levels. A recurring finding across studies is the persistent gap between learners’ theoretical awareness of suprasegmental features and their practical confidence in producing these features during real-time, spontaneous communication. This gap is attributed to limited explicit instruction, the abstract nature of prosodic features, and the influence of learners’ native language rhythmic patterns. The paper further identifies that EFL learners tend to view intonation as the most communicatively important but also the most cognitively demanding suprasegmental feature, while stress receives moderate attention and rhythm is frequently misunderstood or overlooked entirely. Based on these findings, the article advocates for explicit, integrated, and communicatively embedded teaching of suprasegmental features in EFL classrooms. Practical instructional strategies—including shadowing, rhythm-tapping, and discourse-level intonation analysis—are discussed as means to bridge the divide between learners’ suprasegmental knowledge and their oral performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldukhayel, D., Alrabah, S., & Al-Shammari, E. (2021). EFL learners' perceptions of pronunciation apps. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 10(3), 45–53.

Brazil, D. (1994). Pronunciation for advanced learners of English. Cambridge University Press.

Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486

Derwing, T. M., & Rossiter, M. J. (2002). ESL learners' perceptions of their pronunciation needs and strategies. System, 30(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00012-X

Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588487

Foote, J. A., Holtby, A. K., & Derwing, T. M. (2011). Survey of the teaching of pronunciation in adult ESL programs in Canada. TESL Canada Journal, 29(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v29i1.1086

Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378

Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485

Li, R. (2023). The impact of rhythm, intonation, and stress on B1 adult English as a second language learners. Revista Pacha, 5(3), 1–14.

Murphy, J., & Baker, A. (2015). History of ESL pronunciation teaching. In M. Reed & J. M. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 36–65). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346952.ch3

Pennington, M. C., & Rogerson-Revell, P. (2019). English pronunciation teaching and research: Contemporary perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47677-7

Saito, Y., & Saito, K. (2017). Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816643111

Setter, J., & Sebina, J. (2017). English lexical stress, prominence and rhythm. In E. Setter & J. Jenkins (Eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene (pp. 23–52). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315145006-9

Yenkimaleki, M., & van Heuven, V. J. (2023). The efficacy of segmental/suprasegmental vs. holistic pronunciation instruction on the development of listening comprehension skills by EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 27(4), 1043–1063.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-03

How to Cite

Sifa Askya, Aslimah Nur, Cindy Arianti Damanik, & Yani Lubis. (2026). Students’ Perceptions of Stress, Intonation, and Rhythm in English Communication. Sintaksis : Publikasi Para Ahli Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 4(4), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v4i4.2764

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.