Feedback and Literacy: Investigating the Mediating Role of Ambiguity in texting communication

Authors

  • Chairos Valentino Sibarani Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Waldi Marbun Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Rita Hartati Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v2i4.1230

Keywords:

ambiguity, feedback, literacy

Abstract

Language literacy is essential for effective communication, especially in text-based interactions where nonverbal cues are absent. This study aims to explore the mediating role of feedback in clarifying ambiguity in text messages among students. While there is already research on feedback and language literacy, there is a gap regarding how feedback can specifically address ambiguity in digital communication. Using a descriptive survey method, data was collected from 30 students at Medan State University through a questionnaire distributed via WhatsApp. The analysis results show that syntactic ambiguity is the most prevalent type, followed by semantic and referential ambiguity. The findings showed that feedback strategies such as repetition, reformulation, and explicit clarification significantly improved understanding and reduced miscommunication. Students reported that these strategies helped clarify ambiguous messages and encouraged clearer interactions with the lecturer. In conclusion, effective feedback mechanisms are essential for improving communication clarity in text messages, especially in academic contexts. This study underscores the importance of developing feedback literacy among university students to effectively navigate ambiguity, thereby improving their language literacy and overall communication skills. Further research can extend these findings by exploring different contexts and demographics to generalize the results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldunate, N., González, M. V., Thomas, F. R., López, V., & Bosman, C. A. (2018). Mood detection in ambiguous messages: The interaction between text and emoticons. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(423), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00423

Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

Ceccato, M., Kiyavitskaya, N., Zeni, N., Mich, L., & Berry, D. M. (2004). Ambiguity identification and measurements in natural language texts. Research Gate, 1–28.

Chong, S. W. (2021). The role of feedback literacy in written corrective feedback research: From feedback information to feedback ecology. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082120

Gee, J. P. (2010). A situated-sociocultural approach to literacy and technology.

Hussain, Z., & Lukmana, I. (2019). An exploratory study of the characteristics of textisms in text messaging. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 253, 469–472.

Kaur, J. (2017). Ambiguity-related misunderstanding and clarity-enhancing practices in ELF communication. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314511196. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0002

Lavigne, & Good. (2015). In Oprescu, C. M. (2020). Exploring the role of feedback in the context of pre-university didactic communication. Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism. ISSN: 2734-4754.

Littlejohn. (1992). In Van Ruler, B. (2018). Communication theory: An underrated pillar on which strategic communication rests. International Journal of Strategic Communication.

Ramani, S., Könings, K. D., & Ginsburg, S. (2019). Feedback redefined: Principles and practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(5), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04874-2

Rosengren. (2000). In Van Ruler, B. (2018). Communication theory: An underrated pillar on which strategic communication rests. International Journal of Strategic Communication.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In Chong, S. W. (2021). The role of feedback literacy in written corrective feedback research: From feedback information to feedback ecology. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082120

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087

Yuzhannikova, M. A. (2015). A typology of linguistic ambiguity. Siberian Federal University Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 8(3), 533–541.

Zanchi, P., Zampini, L., & Fasolo, M. (2019). Oral narrative competence and literacy skills. Early Child Development and Care. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2019.1572132

Downloads

Published

2024-12-04

How to Cite

Chairos Valentino Sibarani, Waldi Marbun, & Rita Hartati. (2024). Feedback and Literacy: Investigating the Mediating Role of Ambiguity in texting communication. Fonologi : Jurnal Ilmuan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 2(4), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v2i4.1230

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>