The Relevance of David B. Resnik's Ethical Principles in Academic Writing and Research for Students

Authors

  • Sonya Pasaribu Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Sonya S.M. Silitonga Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Rita Hartati Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v2i4.1250

Keywords:

Academic ethics, David B. Resnik, honesty, plagiarism, ethical challenges, academic integrity, research ethics, student awareness

Abstract

This study investigates the application of David B. Resnik's ethical principles—honesty, objectivity, integrity, carefulness, and openness—in academic writing and research among students. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, surveys and student paper analyses were conducted to measure awareness, adherence, and challenges. The results indicate that 95% of students are aware of general ethical principles in academic writing, yet only 70% are familiar with Resnik’s specific framework, leaving 30% unaware of these detailed concepts. Regarding practice, 100% of respondents consistently cited sources correctly, but 66% admitted to paraphrasing without proper attribution, showing gaps between ethical knowledge and application. Challenges identified include maintaining honesty (51%), avoiding plagiarism (29%), ensuring openness (11%), and minimizing bias (9%), often influenced by external pressures and resource limitations. To address these issues, students suggested practical solutions such as workshops, seminars, and digital guides to enhance understanding and compliance with ethical standards. This study emphasizes the importance of ethics education, institutional policy enhancements, and accessible resources to strengthen the implementation of academic integrity, bridging the gap between awareness and consistent ethical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Elliot, N. (2016). A Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment. Journal of Writing Assessment, 9(1), 1-28. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/36t565mm

Erickson, F. (1985). Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching. Institute for Research on Teaching.

Heigham, J., & Croker, R. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239517

IBRAHIM, M., AHMAD, S., ABDULLAH, H., YAN JU, S., & AL-SINAWI, S. H. N. (2021). Determinants of Plagiarism in Plagiarism Behavior and Their Effects on Total Quality Management: A Multicultural Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 46(2), : 13-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2021-46.02-02

Henriksen, D., J. Woo, L., & Mishra, P. (2023, June 12). Creative Uses of ChatGPT for Education: a Conversation with Ethan Mollick. Tech Trends, 67(4), 595-600.

Henriksen, D., J. Woo, L., & Mishra, P. (2023, September 8). Literacy as a Technology: a Conversation with Kyle Jensen about AI, Writing and More. Tech Trends, 67, 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00888-0

Hyland, K. (2015). Teaching and Researching Writing: Third Edition (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717203

Law Insider. (n.d.). Academic ethics definition [Dictionary]. https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/academic-ethics

Mahagiyani, M., & Sugiono, S. (2024). Buku Ajar Metodologi Penelitian. https://repository.polteklpp.ac.id/id/eprint/5059/1/News%2020232024%20MHY_BAHAN%20AJAR%20METODOLOGI%20PENELITIAN%20(isbn%204%20Maret%202024).pdf

Miao, J. (2024). Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review. Clinics and Practice, 14, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14010008

OROSOO, M., RAASH, N., SANTOSH, K., KAUR, D. C., BANI-YOUNIS, ,. D. J. M. A., & RENGARAJAN, M. (2023, December). EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY IN MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 101(23), 7847-7855. https://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol101No23/28Vol101No23.pdf

OXY Occidental College. (n.d.). Academic Ethics [Student Handbook]. https://www.oxy.edu/student-handbook/shared-academic-integrity-commitment/academic-ethics

Pope, C., & Mays, N. (Eds.). (2007). Qualitative Research in Health Care. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470750841

Resnik, D. B. (2011, May 1). What is Ethics in Research & Why is it Important? National Institute of Environmental Health Science. https://scholar.google.co.id/scholar_url?url=https://www.veronaschools.org/cms/lib02/NJ01001379/Centricity/Domain/588/What%2520is%2520Ethics%2520in%2520Research%2520Why%2520is%2520it%2520Important.pdf&hl=id&sa=X&ei=UCw6Z-3yD6jB6rQP07vr0Qs&scisig=AFWwaeYpTf

Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. The Office of Research Integrity (ORI).

Sawitri, A. A. S. (2019). Ethical violations and the publication of journal articles. Public Health and Preventive Medicine Archive (PHPMA), 7(2), 73-74.

Maloshonok, N., & Shmeleva, E. (2019, January). Factors Influencing Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students at Russian Universities. Journal of Academic Ethics, 17, 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-9324-y

Downloads

Published

2024-12-06

How to Cite

Sonya Pasaribu, Sonya S.M. Silitonga, & Rita Hartati. (2024). The Relevance of David B. Resnik’s Ethical Principles in Academic Writing and Research for Students. Fonologi : Jurnal Ilmuan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 2(4), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v2i4.1250

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>