Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication in Grade 11 EFL Classroom Interaction

Authors

  • Adel Pinola Br Ginting Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Dinda Khairani Pratiwi Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Dinda Nurul Fadillah Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Nurfarah Nurfarah Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Naufal Nasution Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v3i4.2308

Keywords:

Classroom Interaction, English Language Learning, Nonverbal Communication, Teaching Strategies, Verbal Communication

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze verbal and non-verbal communication in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom by using the Sinclair and Coulthard (1975) model of classroom discourse. Although many studies have examined verbal interaction in EFL classrooms, few have discussed how verbal and non-verbal communication work together to support effective learning. To fill this gap, this research focuses on identifying the types and frequency of verbal and non-verbal communication used by the teacher and students during classroom interaction. This study used a descriptive qualitative method. The data were taken from an 80-minute video recording of an eleventh-grade English class at MAS Darul Quran. The recording was transcribed and analyzed based on Sinclair and Coulthard’s framework, which includes three main levels: Exchange (Informing, Directive, Question–Answer), Move (Initiation, Response, Feedback), and Act (Questioning, Explaining, Agreeing, Refusing, Revising, Appraising). The findings show that the classroom interaction was mainly teacher-centered. The teacher dominated the talk through Initiation moves, mostly in the form of questions, explanations, and instructions, while students gave short and simple responses. Feedback was used less often and mostly as short praise or confirmation. The teacher also used various non-verbal behaviors such as gestures, eye contact, movement, and changes in voice tone to direct attention and motivate students. The results suggest that combining verbal and non-verbal strategies can create a more interactive and engaging classroom atmosphere that supports student participation and understanding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812201284

Fitriani, E. (2017). Teacher talk in EFL classroom: A discourse analysis. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 1(2), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.1.2.50-63

Fitriani, S. (2017). Classroom discourse analysis in Indonesian EFL contexts. Banda Aceh: Ar-Raniry Press.

Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Addison-Wesley.

Gower, R., Phillips, D., & Walters, S. (2005). Teaching practice handbook (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Harahap, N. A. S., & Emzir. (2015). Teacher talk and classroom interaction in Indonesian EFL secondary schools. Journal of English Education, 3(2), 120-129.

Hardman, F., Smith, F., & Wall, K. (2003). 'Interactive whole class teaching' in the National Literacy Strategy. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(2), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640302044

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Kasim, H. Y., & De Joseph, K. (2022). Teacher-student verbal communication and student learning. International Journal of Curriculum Development, Teaching and Learning Innovation, 1(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.35335/curriculum.v1i1.53

McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.

Mehrabian, A. (2007). Nonverbal communication. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.

Nisa, A. (2020). Patterns of teacher talk in Indonesian EFL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 99-113.

Nisa, K. (2020). An analysis of IRF structure in English classroom interaction. Journal of English Language Studies, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v5i1.7080

Octavia, S., & Zainuddin, H. (2018). Question types and student responses in EFL classrooms. English Education Journal, 9(3), 350-359.

Ruswandi, R., Arief, M., & Novitasari. (2024). Inspiring through interaction: The impact of teachers' verbal and non-verbal communication in EFL classes. VELES Journal. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.26821

Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Blackwell.

Sert, O. (2017). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. ELT Journal, 71(4), 456-466.

Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.

Suherdi, D. (2012). Classroom discourse analysis: A systemic functional perspective. Bandung: Rizqi Press.

Suryati, N. (2015). Classroom interaction strategies of English teachers at lower secondary schools. TEFLIN Journal, 26(2), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/247-264

Suryati, N. (2015). Classroom interactional competence in Indonesian EFL secondary school classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v4i2.686

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826

Yanfen, L., & Yuqin, Z. (2010). A study of teacher talk in interactions in English classes. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 76-86.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-14

How to Cite

Adel Pinola Br Ginting, Dinda Khairani Pratiwi, Dinda Nurul Fadillah, Nurfarah Nurfarah, & Naufal Nasution. (2026). Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication in Grade 11 EFL Classroom Interaction. Fonologi: Jurnal Ilmuan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 3(4), 01–09. https://doi.org/10.61132/fonologi.v3i4.2308

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.