Penggunaan Eufemisme sebagai Strategi Pelanggaran Maksim dalam Film The Substance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/semantik.v4i3.2790Keywords:
Aging Anxiety, Euphemism, Flouting Maxim, Pragmatic Analysis, The SubstanceAbstract
Euphemistic expressions are frequently employed in communication to present unpleasant or sensitive realities in a more acceptable manner. From a pragmatic perspective, euphemisms may also serve as a means of flouting conversational maxims, enabling speakers to imply meanings indirectly rather than state them explicitly. This study investigates the use of euphemism as a maxim-flouting strategy in the film The Substance. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, the study analyzed euphemistic utterances identified from the film screenplay by applying Grice’s Cooperative Principle and theories of euphemism. The analysis demonstrates that euphemisms are utilized to obscure, soften, or indirectly convey sensitive matters associated with aging, declining fame, concealed identity, illness, and bodily transformation. These expressions were found to involve the flouting of the maxims of quantity, quality, relation, and manner, thereby generating conversational implicatures that require audiences to infer meanings beyond the literal expressions. Furthermore, the findings indicate that euphemism contributes significantly to reinforcing the film’s major concerns, particularly those related to beauty standards, anxiety about aging, and self-identity. Accordingly, euphemism functions not merely as a politeness strategy but also as an effective pragmatic device for constructing implicit meaning in cinematic discourse.
Downloads
References
Abi, M., Syahid, A., Rahmawati, L., & Hastuti, H. (2025). Pragmatic analysis of flouting Grice’s maxims in Indonesian and US presidential debates. LITERA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 11(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.36002/litera.v11i2.3891
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism & dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford University Press.
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881
Bobeica, G. (2022). The functional feature of euphemisms in the diplomatic language. Philologia, LXIV, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.52505/1857-4300.2022.3(318).07
Cutting, J. (2005). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Fargeat, C. (Director). (2024). The Substance [Film]. Working Title Films.
Golubeva, T. (2025). Towards a distinction between non-euphemistic and euphemism-based politically correct expressions: A relevance-theoretic perspective. Pragmatics, 35(4), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23032.gol
Littlemore, J., & Fielden-Burns, L. V. (2023). On the fringes of metaphor: Using ambiguously figurative vague language to pragmatically negotiate sensitive topics in the English as a Medium of Instruction classroom. Journal of Pragmatics, 209, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.016
Maurarochelle, V. S., & Ambalegin. (2023). An analysis of particularized implicature in To All the Boys I Loved Before: Always and Forever: Pragmatics approach. E-Journal of Linguistics, 17(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.24843/e-jl.2023.v17.i02.p04
Mironina, A. Y., & Porchesku, G. V. (2017). Euphemism as a linguistic strategy of evasion in political media discourse. Research Result: Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2023-9-2-0-1
Sitorus, T., Gea, J. A., & Sari, A. A. (2025). Flouting of conversational maxims among characters in Conclave (2024). E-Structural, 8(02), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.33633/es.v8i02.15023
Stampe, D. W. (1975). Meaning and truth in the theory of speech acts. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_002
Wening, A. C., Sabat, Y., & Prasetyo, Y. (2024). Flouting maxim found in WhatsApp group chat: Pragmatics analysis. Journal of English Development, 4(1), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.25217/jed.v4i01.4138
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Yule, G. (2020). The study of language (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Semantik : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




