The Application of Sinclair & Coulthard Verbal and Nonverbal Model Analysis in Teaching Descriptive Text
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v3i6.2312Keywords:
Classroom Discourse Analysis, Coulthard Model, Nonverbal Communication, Sinclair, VerbalAbstract
This study aimed to analyze the application of Sinclair and Coulthard’s verbal and nonverbal model in teaching descriptive text to 11th-grade students. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, this research was conducted through Classroom Discourse Analysis based on a recorded English teaching session at MAS Darul Azhariyun. The data consisted of the teacher’s and students’ verbal and nonverbal interactions, transcribed and categorized according to Sinclair and Coulthard’s (1975) framework, including exchange, move, and act. The findings revealed that the classroom interaction was predominantly teacher-centered, structured through the Initiation–Response–Feedback (IRF) sequence. However, despite the teacher’s dominant role, interactive moments occurred through group discussions, presentations, and questioning sessions that encouraged student participation. Nonverbal communication such as gestures, facial expressions, and tone were found to reinforce meaning, support comprehension, and maintain engagement. The study identified that while students’ responses were often short, the teacher’s scaffolding and feedback effectively maintained communicative flow and ensured lesson coherence. These findings suggest that the integration of verbal and nonverbal discourse based on Sinclair and Coulthard’s model contributes to clearer instructional structure, improved classroom interaction, and increased student attentiveness. It also highlights the potential of discourse analysis as a reflective tool for teachers to evaluate communication strategies and promote more interactive, meaningful language learning environments.
Downloads
References
Barnes, D. (1971). Language, the learner and the school. Penguin Books.
Cavarallo, C. (2004). Classroom discourse and the negotiation of meaning. Routledge.
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
Foucault, M. (2011). The order of discourse. In The archaeology of knowledge (pp. 215–237). Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7
Li, D. (2010). The functions of teacher talk in classroom discourse. Asian Social Science, 6(4), 93–99.
McCarthy, M. (2002). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge.
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.3.1.12hinbenjamins.com+1
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. Ballantine Books.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605895
Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn: The social contexts of cognitive development (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sintaksis : Publikasi Para ahli Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.