Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Siswa Terhadap Materi Ide Pokok dan Ide Pendukung Teks Deskripsi di Kelas IX-I SMP Negeri 13 Surabaya

Aurora Putri Nidya; Sueb Hadi

doi:10.61132/pragmatik.v2i4.1048

Authors

Aurora Putri Nidya Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya
Sueb Hadi Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/pragmatik.v2i4.1048

Keywords:

cooperative learning, TPS, learning outcomes, main idea, supporting ideas

Abstract

Through classroom action research conducted in two cycles, this study aims to improve the understanding of grade IX-I students of SMP Negeri 13 Surabaya on the material of main ideas and supporting ideas of descriptive texts by implementing the TPS cooperative learning model. The results of the study showed a significant increase in student understanding after the implementation of the Think Pair Share learning model. In the pre-cycle, the average student test score was 65. After cycle I, the average score increased to 78, indicating an increase of 20%. In cycle II, the average score reached 85, or an increase of 9% from cycle I. This increase is indicated by the increasing number of students who can correctly identify the main idea and supporting ideas of descriptive texts. In addition, student activeness in discussing and giving opinions also increased significantly. This shows that the Think Pair Share cooperative learning model is effective in improving students' understanding of the main idea and supporting ideas of descriptive texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2018). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Haryanto, B. (2022). Strategi Pembelajaran Membaca Teks Deskriptif di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 11(2), 30-45.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2020). Cooperative Learning: The Foundation for Active Learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner (3rd ed.). Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Lyman, F. T. (1981). The Responsive Classroom Discussion. In A. S. Anderson (Ed.), Mainstreaming Digest (Vol. 6, pp. 3-13). University of Maryland, College Park.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Prasetyo, B. (2023). Efektivitas Model Think Pair Share dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris di SMP Negeri 5 Jakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 12(1), 45-58.

Rahmawati, D. (2022). Penerapan Model Think Pair Share untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 15(2), 112-125.

Sari, M. (2021). Kesulitan Siswa dalam Memahami Struktur Teks Deskripsi di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 10(3), 67-80.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Membaca sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Wibowo, A. (2021). Penggunaan Think Pair Share untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(3), 20-34.

Wijaya, A. (2022). Implementasi Model Think Pair Share dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMP Negeri 7 Surabaya. Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran, 14(4), 89-102.